Re: AWS cleanup - what to delete next?

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 08:40:32PM +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>  Dne 09. 02. 24 v 20:34 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a):
>  > > I think we should leave "GA" images. Even thought they are EOL for
> the
>  > > most part, I think it's still possibly nice to be able to spin one up to
>  > > test something or the like. We can find the names on our download
>  > > server, ie,
>  > > 
>  > >
> https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/releases/35/Cloud/x...
>  > > Fedora-Cloud-Base-35-1.2 is the GA for fedora 35 cloud.
>  > 
>  > Nod. I was about to ask how can I find them... but the name match
>  > nicely. And going manualy over 35 names is likely not big deal.
>  > 
>  > I will tag them. Then they disappear from my radar.
>  > 
>  > I propose tag
>  > 
>  > FedoraGroup=ga-archives
>  > 
>  > Any objections?
>  > 
>  I tagged all GA images with this ^^^ tag. 
Thanks.

>  I went from Fedora 39 down to Fedora 19. But I did not find any image
> for
>  Fedora 19 and 20 (that is year 2013) so I stopped there.
>  
>  I label AMIs and associated snapshots.
>  
>  For the record, this is the the script I used for labeling the AMI in all
>  regions
>  https://github.com/xsuchy/fedora-infra-scripts/blob/main/label-ami.py
>  
>  
>  Who is responsible for uploading Fedora Cloud images to AWS? Fedora Cloud
>  SIG? Somebody else? I want to make sure that consequent GA images, will be
>  properly tagged. 
Well, it's done with the fedimg app in fedora infra currently, so thats
where it would need to change right now. 

The cloud sig has plans to replace fedimg, which I hope they can do well
before rhel7 eol in a few months, because fedimg is python2/rhel7. 

kevin