+1
On Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:48 AM Adam Williamson
<adamwill(a)fedoraproject.org> wrote:
On Thu, 2024-04-18 at 17:14 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> In the run up to f40 final we were using a koji with a patch to _not_
> enable the builroot repo when making containers via kiwi plugin.
> This was to fix the fact that pulling from the buildroot repo pulls
> unsigned rpms, making all the rpms installed in the container unsigned.
>
> Foolishly, I pulled a newer/expansion of that patch from upstream in in
> the last round of updates, but something in it's defaults/logic causes
> it to not disable the buildroot repo, and again containers have unsigned
> rpms. ;(
>
> So, what I would like to do is go back to the previous patch we had that
> just has the 'only enable buildroot when no repos are passed' patch.
>
> Ideally we would do this today so the last f40 nightly would be right.
> If not tho, we could land it anytime and then the nightly container
> builds would be fixed.
>
> Can I get +1s for this plan?
+1
--
Adam Williamson (he/him/his)
Fedora QA
Fedora Chat: @adamwill:fedora.im | Mastodon: @adamw(a)fosstodon.org
https://www.happyassassin.net
--
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue