Dne 20. 06. 20 v 19:34 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 11:07:59AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 18. 06. 20 v 19:48 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>> On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 10:12:11AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Dne 17. 06. 20 v 19:54 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 09:23:38AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Theres not a seperate one for epel, but it might be possible to make
>>>> one looking at bugzilla overrides.
>>> Just to give you a bit of context, this alias would be useful when
>>> introducing new package into RHEL, where the package is already present
>>> in EPEL and therefore have to be removed. So it would help with a way to
>>> contact the relevant people without the need of gathering their emails.
>> Yeah, +1. This would be a great use for that alias.
>
> Should I open a ticket? Is this realistic any time soon?
For documenting the aliases? Well, you can edit the wiki... or did you
want a better place for it, like in docs?
Or did you mean getting RHEL maintainers to mail it when introducing new
packages to RHEL? Thats beyond our scope here, and would have to be some
internal process.
Sorry for getting lost you here. I was still talking about the EPEL
email alias. So is the EPEL email alias thing which could be implemented
soon so is it worth of opening ticket?
Vít