On 11/3/23 03:00, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 03. 11. 23 v 2:06 Dusty Mabe napsal(a):
> We'll clean up the ones we do not need soon. I'm sorry it is taking longer
than we thought it would to
> get garbage collection implemented.
Thank you.
> * Fedora-Cloud-Base-29-20190729.0.x86_64-hvm-us-east-1-standard-0 - is this snapshots
used to generate AMIs for
>> getfedora.org? Do we still need it?
>>
>> If you have snapshots that are important, please check that it have tag
FedoraGroup=*
> Hmm. Is that required? If so, is it new?
It is in our SOP for ages
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/infra/sysadmin_guide/aws-access/#_ec2
but so far no ones checked it and enforced.
Does that mean we should set ours to FedoraGroup=coreos ?
>
>> When we (Fedora CoreOS Group) create AMIs we don't add tags
>> like this to our AMIs.
>
> I am now focusing on Snapshots, but please add it to any resource.
>
> When we started we have few resources there and it was easy to clean up leftovers and
identify owners. Now we have there thousands resources in dozen regions. And it is hard to
garbage collect resources and identify who is responsible for consuming expensive
resources. While this account is sponsored by AWS it does not mean that we can misuse it
and leave garbage behind and let Amazon pay for that.
>
> Miroslav
>
> --
> Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
> Red Hat, Manager, Packit and CPT, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue