On Thu, 30 Aug 2018 at 09:30, Peter Robinson <pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> +30 IN PTR
osbs-aarch64-master01.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +31 IN PTR
osbs-aarch64-node01.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +32 IN PTR
osbs-aarch64-node02.stg.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +33 IN PTR
osbs-aarch64-master01.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +34 IN PTR
osbs-aarch64-node01.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +35 IN PTR
osbs-aarch64-node02.arm.fedoraproject.org.
> +osbsworker-aarch64-master01.stg IN A 10.5.129.30
> +osbsworker-aarch64-node01.stg IN A 10.5.129.31
> +osbsworker-aarch64-node02.stg IN A 10.5.129.32
> +osbsworker-aarch64-master01 IN A 10.5.129.33
> +osbsworker-aarch64-node01 IN A 10.5.129.34
> +osbsworker-aarch64-node02 IN A 10.5.129.35
Are the reverse names intended to be different to the forward names?
maybe sed 's/osbs-aarch64/osbsworker-aarch64/' or visa versa?
No they weren't I was using the names as they showed up in the
existing reverse. I have cleaned that and put in the updated patch
set. thank you for catching it also.
Peter
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list -- infrastructure(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to infrastructure-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/infrastructure@lists.fedora...
--
Stephen J Smoogen.