On 21 June 2017 at 14:04, Matthew Miller
<mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:46:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > There is a fairly large amount of people who continue to use a
> > release
> > after it is EOL. It was about making sure that the archives do
> > not get
> > overloaded with requests as there is not many mirrors there. and
> > to
> > allow for a smooth transition phase for users. Perhaps we could
> > change
> > it and keep one less release. I would like to see how many hits
> > we get
> > on mirrormanager for f22 and f23 today so we can make it an
> > informed
> > decision.
>
> So, the good news on this point is that we're doing a relatively
> good
> job of keeping people current -- the work we're doing on making
> upgrades smooth seems to be paying off. A little shy of 47% of
> mirror
> checkins come from F25 (with F26 beta and Rawhide contributing
> another
> 1.5%). F24 is 15%, and F23 is 12%.
>
> F22 drops down to 6.2%, F21 is 4.3%, and F20 is 5.9%. (F20 looks
> like
> it's going to linger for a good long time.)
>
> Everthing below F20 is basically peanuts in comparison (although
> shout-out to F8, still holding on at around 1.6%, which puts it
> higher
> than every pre-F20 release).
>
> I'm not sure exactly where the cutoff should be, but I guess I'd be
> a
> bit hesitant to move F23 away just yet. But, maybe we should make
> it
> easier for mirrors to have only-current and current-1? (F24 is only
> 15%, but of course that was much higher six months at F25 launch.)
>
Disk space usage:
229579556 ./releases/22
241847672 ./releases/23
266998276 ./releases/24
283076772 ./releases/25
369167536 ./releases/test
149712936 ./updates/22
165263264 ./updates/23
168937164 ./updates/24
152521284 ./updates/25
199292064 ./updates/testing
2226396828 total
[Without hardlinking]
[root@batcave01 linux][PROD]# du -shlc ./releases ./updates
2.1T ./releases
932G ./updates
3.0T total
[With hardlinking]
1.3T ./releases
798G ./updates
2.1T total
In the past we had a '1 TB limit' to what we said we offered on the
mirrors. We are currently at 2-3 times that depending on whether a
mirror can hardlink. I am very worried about how much this will grow
under the new modularity and other images we are planning to present.
>
> --
> Matthew Miller
> <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>
> Fedora Project Leader
> _______________________________________________
> Mirror-admin mailing list -- mirror-admin(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to mirror-admin-leave(a)lists.fedoraproj
>
ect.org
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________
Mirror-admin mailing list -- mirror-admin(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to mirror-admin-leave(a)lists.fedoraprojec
t.org
Maybe more scrutiny should be applied to which packages get included in
the Fedora distribution repositories. It looks like about 86 gigabytes
of what we are currently mirroring is games (not accounting for hard
linking).
dnf groupinfo "Games and Entertainment" | awk '/^ / {print $1}' >
~/games.txt
cd /pub/fedora/linux
find . > ~/rpms.txt
for i in $(< ~/games.txt); do for j in $(grep "/$i-" ~/rpms.txt); do du
-B 1K $j >> ~/sizes.txt; done; done
cat ~/sizes.txt | sort | uniq > ~/sizes-uniq.txt
awk '{sum+=$1} END {print sum/1024/1024 "GiB"}' ~/sizes-uniq.txt
86.1718GiB
Alternatively, perhaps the games should have their own classification
parallel with "releases" and "updates" that could be easily filtered.
--
Gregory Lee Bartholomew
PGP Key ID: 3B67510E