[389-devel] please review: Ticket 509 - lock-free access to be->be_suffixlock

[Ludwig Krispenz]

Hi,
On 12/07/2012 05:56 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> Hi Ludwig,
>
> In Ticket 507, that change did not help after all, and will probably 
> be removed.
>
> As far as I can tell, this is the only option we have for ticket 509.
yes, but the subject says lock free. So if we cannot make it lock free 
is it justified to just change the lock type ?

Ludwig
>
> Mark
>
> On 12/07/2012 11:50 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the 
>> backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these 
>> are better here ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ludwig
>>
>> On 12/07/2012 05:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
>>>
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/509/0001-Ticket-509-lock-free-access-to-be-be_suffixlock.patch 
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> 389-devel mailing list
>> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>