[389-devel] please review: Ticket 509 - lock-free access to be->be_suffixlock

[Rich Megginson]

On 12/07/2012 09:56 AM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
> Hi Ludwig,
>
> In Ticket 507, that change did not help after all, and will probably 
> be removed.

It's hard to tell.  I'm having some problems getting reliable reports.  
We are working on that.

>
> As far as I can tell, this is the only option we have for ticket 509.

Any locking is going to be worse than doing some sort of lock-free access.

>
> Mark
>
> On 12/07/2012 11:50 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the 
>> backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these 
>> are better here ?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ludwig
>>
>> On 12/07/2012 05:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
>>>
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/509/0001-Ticket-509-lock-free-access-to-be-be_suffixlock.patch 
>>>
>>>
>>
>> -- 
>> 389-devel mailing list
>> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>