[389-devel] strcasestr vs. PL_strcasestr

[Rich Megginson]

On 03/07/2014 07:15 AM, Carsten Grzemba wrote:
> Hi Nathan,
>
> is there special reason why you use /strcasestr/ in ACL plugin instead 
> of /PL_strcasestr/.
> It presents me some headache to build 1.3.2 on Solaris 10.
> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/ds.git/commit/ldap/servers/plugins/acl?id=95214606df95deb1cf9a30044fe64f780c030b34

No, there is no reason to use strcasestr.  We should be using 
PL_strcasestr for portability.

>
> Carsten
>
>
> Am 06.03.14 schrieb *Noriko Hosoi * <nhosoi at redhat.com>:
>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47731
>>
>> https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47731/0001-Ticket-47731-A-tombstone-entry-is-deleted-by-ldapdel.patch
>>
>> Description: A tombstone deletion by ldapdelete op from client is
>> supposed to fail. The failure from SLAPI_PLUGIN_BETXNPOSTOPERATION was
>> ignored in 389-ds-base-1.2.11 plugin_call_func and it was not passed to
>> the backend to abort. This patch added the check in the same way as in
>> 389-ds-base-1.3.1 and newer.
>> --
>> 389-devel mailing list
>> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
>
>
> --
> 389-devel mailing list
> 389-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-devel/attachments/20140307/db41326e/attachment.html>