Shotwell 0.5

[Rahul Sundaram]

On 03/17/2010 09:26 PM, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>
>> The current DVD image is basically defined by comps and if you edit
>> comps, you can control the result and since rel-eng does the compose,
>> aren't they responsible for it?  If not, how do we fix it?  We cannot
>> just ignore that experience.  The desktop live image despite being the
>> default doesn't cover a bunch of use cases (ability to select a
>> different package set or even a different filesystem for example) and
>> Mo's survey shows that the majority of users continue to download the
>> DVD image and while taking the step of moving to a large image and
>> offering a better out of box experience solves some of that, it doesn't
>> make the proble go away. 
>>
>> Alternatively,  if noone is responsible for it, why are we still doing it?
>>     
> Correction to above -- actually, direct download numbers I pull from
> the HTTP logs show that the Desktop Live image far outnumber the DVD.
> Mo's survey shows that the majority of respondents to her survey
> continue to download the DVD image. :-)
>   

Sorry but I don't see the correction. Aren't you agreeing with on Mo's
survey?

Rahul