FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Till Maas]

On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 11:22:25PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 04:14:37PM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> 
> > ...and as in all threads about this that I can remember, the obvious fix
> > to the above is having two repos. and let everyone who wants a giant
> > firehose of mostly working stuff can enable this second repo. if only we
> > could create this "testing of the updates" repo. surely everyone would
> > be happy.
> 
> It seems more like we need three repos then. The current situation
> works well enough for me and I do not remember that I ever wanted to
> downgrade something except that I am still missing kpdf/kprinter, but
> both went away in a distribution upgrade. But I was more often hit by
> not up to date packages in Fedora.

Since we have already two stable releases, this could also be solved by
further restricting the updates for FN-1 when FN is released.

Regards
Till
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20100226/57033c54/attachment.bin