Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

[Matt McCutchen]

On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> When the shebang is to allow running some sort of unittest I generally just
> leave it alone (the end user won't want to run it and upstream does want to
> run the code when they're testing).

There is still no reason to have a shebang on a non-executable file.
The file must have started out executable in order for upstream to run
it.  The proper solution would be to remove the shebang in the same
place the executability gets removed.

-- 
Matt