Package maintainers -- want test results by mail?

[seth vidal]

On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 10:57 -0400, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-06-02 at 14:46 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > When the shebang is to allow running some sort of unittest I generally just
> > leave it alone (the end user won't want to run it and upstream does want to
> > run the code when they're testing).
> 
> There is still no reason to have a shebang on a non-executable file.
> The file must have started out executable in order for upstream to run
> it.  The proper solution would be to remove the shebang in the same
> place the executability gets removed.

another option is to not flag things which impact NOT AT ALL
functionality :)


-sv