Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
>
> As long as the RE and QE requirements are similarly defined that's fine. 

It would be good to get a clarification from fesco what they are 
referring to when they speak of "QE" ( Depending on it's meaning it 
might fall under the QA community ) and what they think those 
requirements are...

JBG