Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
> Let's make the list exhaustive; there needs to be a path to sure 
> success.  This means establishing a complete procedure where when an 
> SA formally applies to become PA, acceptance means there is a 
> definitive set of steps needed to get there.  This is one of the major 
> reasons for developing these criteria.  Put another way:
>
> FESCo and affected groups should have the ability to review whether or 
> not the SA has in-fact fulfilled the requirements for PA, as agreed to 
> by all parties at the time of application.  If those requirements are 
> deemed to have been met, promotion is automatic.
>
> There could be a deadline on application acceptance: EG, 12 months 
> from acceptance of application to fulfillment of criteria.  This 
> protects against criteria becoming stale. 

This sound like the most reasonable approach.

JBG