Proposed F19 Feature: systemd features

["Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"]

On 02/02/2013 07:57 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:24:39AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>>> On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>>>> If you can't handle that, then Fedora development might not be the right
>>>>> place for you.
>>>>>
>>>> Get the fuck out before you get in my business. If you want to test
>>>> me here I am deal with it because I wont back down not after the
>>>> treatment he has given me!
>>>>
>>>> You have absolutely no idea what I have sacrificed for the project
>>>> and if you want to head down that road son realize I dont bark I
>>>> bite!
>>>>
>>>> Chris Adams care to explain to me what the fuck you have been doing
>>>> all those years other than trying to play the tough boy?
>>>>
>>>> Let's put your contribution to the test!
>>> Congratulations! You have proved your "merit" once again. That personal
>>> attack was uncalled for.
>> Was it?
> Yes, it was.
>
>> He threaten me I responded.
> Really? AFAICS you have been the only one threatening in this thread ("I
> dont bark I bite").

Back me up to an wall I certainly will

>
>> The position and do correct me if I'm wrong for Adam did not exist
>> before he got hired,
>> and he was not even hired from the community.
> Ah, so your grievance is that Red Hat has hired Adam but not you.

God no losing James yes cry myself to a huge pillow every night

>
>> Care to share the link to his position at that time.
>>
>> Feel free to use the internet archive let's analyze what stood in it,
> I do not see how this could have any relevance to the matter.
>
>> Prove me wrong and I shall be the first to admit my wrong doing, my
>> mistake and apologize to all parties involved.
> Since Chris' sentence "If you can't handle that, then Fedora development
> might not be the right place for you." can hardly be considered an
> attack (or a threat), I hereby claim that you are wrong and your harsh
> response to him was uncalled for.

I guess that's all in the hands of the beholder

JBG