Proposed F19 Feature: systemd features

David Tardon dtardon at redhat.com
Sat Feb 2 08:38:21 UTC 2013


On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:19:29AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 02/02/2013 07:57 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> >On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:24:39AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >>On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> >>>On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> >>>>On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> >>>>>If you can't handle that, then Fedora development might not be the right
> >>>>>place for you.
> >>>>>
> >>>>Get the fuck out before you get in my business. If you want to test
> >>>>me here I am deal with it because I wont back down not after the
> >>>>treatment he has given me!
> >>>>
> >>>>You have absolutely no idea what I have sacrificed for the project
> >>>>and if you want to head down that road son realize I dont bark I
> >>>>bite!
> >>>>
> >>>>Chris Adams care to explain to me what the fuck you have been doing
> >>>>all those years other than trying to play the tough boy?
> >>>>
> >>>>Let's put your contribution to the test!
> >>>Congratulations! You have proved your "merit" once again. That personal
> >>>attack was uncalled for.
> >>Was it?
> >Yes, it was.
> >
> >>He threaten me I responded.
> >Really? AFAICS you have been the only one threatening in this thread ("I
> >dont bark I bite").
> 
> Back me up to an wall I certainly will

But he did not propose to do anything of that sort. So this is not an
argument.

> >
> >>Care to share the link to his position at that time.
> >>
> >>Feel free to use the internet archive let's analyze what stood in it,
> >I do not see how this could have any relevance to the matter.
> >
> >>Prove me wrong and I shall be the first to admit my wrong doing, my
> >>mistake and apologize to all parties involved.
> >Since Chris' sentence "If you can't handle that, then Fedora development
> >might not be the right place for you." can hardly be considered an
> >attack (or a threat), I hereby claim that you are wrong and your harsh
> >response to him was uncalled for.
> 
> I guess that's all in the hands of the beholder

If you really see that sentence as a threat to you, in my opinion you
should seek a psychiatrist.

D.


More information about the devel mailing list