Proposed F19 Feature: systemd features

"Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" johannbg at gmail.com
Sat Feb 2 09:09:01 UTC 2013


On 02/02/2013 08:38 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 08:19:29AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 02/02/2013 07:57 AM, David Tardon wrote:
>>> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 07:24:39AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>>> On 02/02/2013 07:12 AM, David Tardon wrote:
>>>>> On Sat, Feb 02, 2013 at 06:20:18AM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>>>>>> On 02/02/2013 05:57 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>>>>>> If you can't handle that, then Fedora development might not be the right
>>>>>>> place for you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Get the fuck out before you get in my business. If you want to test
>>>>>> me here I am deal with it because I wont back down not after the
>>>>>> treatment he has given me!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You have absolutely no idea what I have sacrificed for the project
>>>>>> and if you want to head down that road son realize I dont bark I
>>>>>> bite!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chris Adams care to explain to me what the fuck you have been doing
>>>>>> all those years other than trying to play the tough boy?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's put your contribution to the test!
>>>>> Congratulations! You have proved your "merit" once again. That personal
>>>>> attack was uncalled for.
>>>> Was it?
>>> Yes, it was.
>>>
>>>> He threaten me I responded.
>>> Really? AFAICS you have been the only one threatening in this thread ("I
>>> dont bark I bite").
>> Back me up to an wall I certainly will
> But he did not propose to do anything of that sort. So this is not an
> argument.
>
>>>> Care to share the link to his position at that time.
>>>>
>>>> Feel free to use the internet archive let's analyze what stood in it,
>>> I do not see how this could have any relevance to the matter.
>>>
>>>> Prove me wrong and I shall be the first to admit my wrong doing, my
>>>> mistake and apologize to all parties involved.
>>> Since Chris' sentence "If you can't handle that, then Fedora development
>>> might not be the right place for you." can hardly be considered an
>>> attack (or a threat), I hereby claim that you are wrong and your harsh
>>> response to him was uncalled for.
>> I guess that's all in the hands of the beholder
> If you really see that sentence as a threat to you, in my opinion you
> should seek a psychiatrist.

I guess the chances of me finding my sanity are as much as openoffice 
and libreoffice getting migrated so I guess from that point we are 
equally screwed ;)


JBG



More information about the devel mailing list