glpk soname bump expected?

[Jerry James]

On Mon, Feb 4, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Orion Poplawski <orion at cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> Hmm, that makes it seem even more likely that upstream fat-fingered
> something.
>
> Although: http://upstream-tracker.org/versions/glpk.html
> does indicate that ABI has been broken (although it has been done so in the
> past without bumping the soname).

Looks like this has been brought up on an upstream mailing list:

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-glpk/2013-01/msg00081.html
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/