ghostscript changing license from GPLv3+ to AGPLv3+

Tom Callaway tcallawa at redhat.com
Fri Feb 22 11:33:11 UTC 2013


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 02/22/2013 12:14 PM, Tim Waugh wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-02-22 at 11:48 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> Is there some exception (like for the database with the
>> unspeakable name), or does this affect CUPS?  Will CUPS be
>> extended to allow downloading the Ghostscript source code?
> 
> Good question: CUPS is licensed as GPLv2, which is listed on the
> Fedora licensing page as not compatible with AGPLv3+.
> 
> The cups package has a requirement on ghostscript-cups, a
> sub-package of ghostscript.  This sub-package provides the CUPS
> filter for converting PostScript or PDF to CUPS Raster format.
> CUPS filters are separate executables which follow a particular
> interface (see the filter(7) man page) regarding stdin, stdout, and
> stderr.
> 
> Not being a linkage dependency, I wasn't expecting that to be
> affected by the Ghostscript license change to Affero GPL.  But
> perhaps it would be?

If it is not a linkage dependency, it should not be.

~tom

==
Fedora Project
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.13 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlEnV3cACgkQPF6ZrZMFQmAJVwCfTXMuUu1NGcZmoqAlXQvUWbSM
0lgAniW8ZaAt1E7wlxC9bxzVNgN1SEKi
=Vcis
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the devel mailing list