f19 mass branching

Kevin Fenzi kevin at scrye.com
Thu Mar 14 15:17:58 UTC 2013


On Thu, 14 Mar 2013 11:05:27 +0100
Vít Ondruch <vondruch at redhat.com> wrote:

> Dennis, I don't blame you, but since you refer the ticket here, I can 
> easily quote:
> 
>  > However, this also means users using branched updates-testing get 
> newer packages than rawhide,
>  > and rawhide lags behind on fixes until those updates are promoted 
> into updates or the base branched
>  > repo. Sometimes this delay is quite long during freezes.
> 
> And this exact point does not apply yet and nobody realized that. I 
> opened new ticket for FESCo to re-evaluate it.

That is taken a bit out of context. I was describing a problem with
the old setup. 

It's simple: always do a rawhide build, then do your branched build. 

kevin
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20130314/f7a9b5dd/attachment-0001.sig>


More information about the devel mailing list