DNF as default package manager

Vít Ondruch vondruch at redhat.com
Thu Jan 22 16:00:07 UTC 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Dne 21.1.2015 v 17:12 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
> On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 11:13:24 +0100
> Mathieu Bridon <bochecha at fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 2015-01-21 at 11:02 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 21.1.2015 v 10:35 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
> >>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 9:22 AM, Miroslav Suchý
> >>> <msuchy at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 01/21/2015 09:33 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>>>> It is surprising to see so many packges depending on yum. Yes,
> >>>>> there is stuff like rpm-build and mock,
> >>>> And mock can live without yum. If we only had weak deps allowed
> >>>> in Fedora mock.spec would have Recommends: yum
> >>>>
> >>>> But I'm really interested in state of DNF as default too. Should
> >>>> I switch mock to use DNF as default? For me there is still lot
> >>>> of unfinished tasks. E.g. documenting what --installroot should
> >>>> actually do [BZ 1163028]
> >>> I don't think it's ready, it might be useful to have an option to
> >>> switch it over for local use to enable easier wider testing but I
> >>> certainly don't think it's ready to be default for mock yet.
> >>>
> >>> Peter
> >>
> >> I am using mock for Fedora development with DNF enabled by default
> >> and it works just fine. May be you want to share what is troubling
> >> you?
>
> > There is a difference between « it works just fine for me » and « it
> > works to build the distro »
>
> and for it works to build the distro it has to work on releases all the
> way back to rhel 5 as we build epel for rhel5 still and need to make
> rhel5 chroots. I have not heard of anybody testing that at all yet.

Actually, the mock configuration might be different for different releases:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/buildsys/2014-December/004444.html

So RHEL5 argument is moot.


Vít
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=xaMG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the devel mailing list