libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

Robin Lee cheeselee at fedoraproject.org
Thu May 28 05:28:39 UTC 2015


Marcin:

You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run 'dnf downgrade
ffmpeg-libs'.

There is no 'branched' repos in RPMFusion. And before f22 is released, you
are actually using the 'rawhide' repos of RPMFusion. But After f22
released, RPMFusion f22 repos is then finally branched and the yum repo
configs are updated in new version of rpmfusion-free-release. So, if you
run a global 'dnf upgrade' before upgrade rpmfusion-free-release, you will
pull in some 'rawhide' packages from RPMFusion.

-roibn

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 4:39 AM, Marcin Juszkiewicz <mjuszkiewicz at redhat.com
> wrote:

> F22 got released so I upgraded my machine from F22 to rawhide. But as
> usual it meant rebuilding rpmfusion packages (as they do not support
> rawhide).
>
> All went quite good. Except installing:
>
> Error: package ffmpeg-libs-2.6.2-3.fc23.x86_64 requires
> libvpx.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed.
>
> Why's that?
>
> libvpx 1.4.0 bumped libvpx.so.1 -> libvpx.so.2 and I did not found any
> mail about it on fedora-devel ML (maybe such mails are not required, no
> idea - many such were sent). Most of rawhide is built against libvpx 1.3.0
> so old soname is required.
>
> Simple 'dnf remove "libvpx.so.1()(64bit)"' on my rawhide shows 512
> packages including wine, kde, gstreamer plugins and lot of other stuff.
>
> How to solve it? I am afraid that answer would be "wait 2 months, we will
> slowly solve it by new uploads" ;(
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20150528/d0d203b4/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the devel mailing list