Open Questions - distinguish packages

[Marcela Mašláňová]

On 03/27/2014 05:04 AM, Honza Horak wrote:
> On 03/26/2014 08:13 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>> On 03/26/2014 02:54 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>>> How do we distinguish packages in the Playground repo from those in the
>>> Fedora's main repo?
>>>
>>> Proposal:
>>> Do not try to distinguish them. Rpmfusion packages also don't have
>>> different dist tag. You can find out if really want to by rpm -something
>>> or check key, which will be also different.
>>>
>>> Let's use the same system, which we used for approval of Playground
>>> repo: mirroring. No disapproval on mailing list means approval on next
>>> meeting.
>>>
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Env_and_Stacks/Playground_repository_%28draft%29#Open_Questions
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> It's close to next question:
>> Does the review differ depending on who is building the package (cla+1
>> vs in the packager group)?
>> Let's say all Playground repositories packagers has to have cla+1, which
>> means they know enough about Legal, so they have to have it right.
>
> I wouldn't say that just from having cla+1 we can say anything about
> packages these people produce. Anyway, cla+1 requirement seems fine to
> me, since IIUIC, that means the person has some sponsor who should watch
> his steps, right? It still can be real beginner with no deeper
> knowledge, though.
>
> Honza
>
True, but that's a problem of the sponsor, isn't it :)

Marcela