[Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

[Ian Malone]

On 27 July 2013 17:24, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
> On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 08:22:25 +0200
> Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On 07/26/2013 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > So, there was some feedback (mostly from QA), but pretty much
>> > nothing from spin owners.
>> >
>> > I guess next step is for me to write up the proposal again with
>> > feedback pulled in and post to devel?
>> >
>> > Any other feedback before I do so?
>> > Or anyone else have desire to write up things? :)
>> >
>> > kevin
>> >
>> The Fedora Jam team (music-creation SIG) can manage at least 2 test
>> matrices for F20. I think we have some good support there.
>
> Cool.
>
>> But our case is somewhat easier - we are simply adding packages to
>> the KDE spin. It is not as if we are providing an alternate desktop
>> or anything. Any errors we catch will probably be picked up by QA as
>> well.
>
> Sure, but there could be errors in the packages you add, their
> interaction with the rest of the desktop or compose issues, etc.

True, though what we mainly find if anything (unless a distro-wide or
KDE spin bug) seems to be compose issues. Actually it's a pity the
formulas idea hasn't really caught anyone's imagination yet.

-- 
imalone
http://ibmalone.blogspot.co.uk