[Fedora-spins] Proposal: Spins process amendment for Fedora 20 cycle

[Kevin Fenzi]

On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 08:22:25 +0200
Brendan Jones <brendan.jones.it at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 07/26/2013 05:36 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > So, there was some feedback (mostly from QA), but pretty much
> > nothing from spin owners.
> >
> > I guess next step is for me to write up the proposal again with
> > feedback pulled in and post to devel?
> >
> > Any other feedback before I do so?
> > Or anyone else have desire to write up things? :)
> >
> > kevin
> >
> The Fedora Jam team (music-creation SIG) can manage at least 2 test 
> matrices for F20. I think we have some good support there.

Cool. 

> But our case is somewhat easier - we are simply adding packages to
> the KDE spin. It is not as if we are providing an alternate desktop
> or anything. Any errors we catch will probably be picked up by QA as
> well.

Sure, but there could be errors in the packages you add, their
interaction with the rest of the desktop or compose issues, etc. 

kevin

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/spins/attachments/20130727/5efcf208/attachment.sig>