"error-type" element needed in grammar

[Matthieu Caneill]

On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:30 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 19:27 +0200, Matthieu Caneill wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:18 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm at redhat.com> wrote:
>> > Isn't this just the test-id attribute of <issue> ?
>>
>> I didn't see this like an error type, but after re-reading its
>> description it seems that it's the corresponding item. Thanks!
>
> Hmmmm... perhaps the attribute needs renaming, or a better description?

Maybe "error-id"? It's the "test" that confused me at first.

--
Matthieu