Flock voting issues

Stephen Gallagher sgallagh at redhat.com
Fri Jun 5 12:07:34 UTC 2015


On Thu, 2015-06-04 at 15:56 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> Over the past few weeks the Flock staff has dealt with a number of
> issues regarding talks and votes.  We'd like to address these 
> shortly,
> so as to limit similar issues in the immediate future.
> 
> It has come to our attention that at least one Flock talk received a
> large number of votes from people that have no realistic intention of
> attending the conference.

Does this account for people who cannot attend but plan to view the
recordings later? Because I'd argue those people *should* still have a
vote.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 181 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/flock-planning/attachments/20150605/5233436e/attachment.sig>


More information about the flock-planning mailing list