Monitoring

[Michael Carruthers]

I have used it extensively and I find to be quite a bit easier than anything else I have run into. In addition it has nice pragmatic methods to add devices in addition to the wonderful web interface.
On 2010-03-04, at 9:58 AM, Jon Stanley wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath at redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> I was always under the impression that ZenOSS wasn't free.  Or at least
>> wasn't fully free.  Is that true?
> 
> It's one of those free/non-free combos - a free "Core", and then an
> enterprise version.  The  core version has most functionality that
> we'd need, but is somewhat difficult to configure IME.  But the web
> interface of it is fairly slick if you can make it work right.
> 
> For one of my customers at $DAYJOB, we're using the free version of
> another one of these, Hyperic HQ from Spring.  It provides great
> depth, but the server and the agent are all Java based, and I've never
> used it for general process monitoring (mostly I want to go into great
> depth of JVM's there).
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure