[fedora-java] Fedora vs JPackage naming

[Aleksandar Kurtakov]

----- Original Message -----
> From: "Carlo de Wolf" <cdewolf at redhat.com>
> To: java-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 11:49:09 AM
> Subject: Re: [fedora-java] Fedora vs JPackage naming
> 
> On 02/17/2012 10:10 AM, David Walluck wrote:
> > On 02/17/2012 03:43 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> >> So the only solution that at least have chances to satisfy our
> >> needs is Ivy :).
> > The point is that something as simple as
> > %_javadir/<artifactId>-<version>.<extension>  probably satisfies 3
> > out of
> > 4 requirements, and ivy also supports maven artifact patterns
> > (really,
> > it is just another location, which could be a simple symlink).
> >
> > So I would agree with you if supporting these crazy builds systems
> > requires a lot (or even a little) extra work.
> >
> > But it seems to me that we get support for free (or at least as
> > best we
> > can, by sticking to the simple flat dir and naming structure
> > above).
> > --
> > java-devel mailing list
> > java-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel
> 
> I just would like to see maven artifacts 'properly' installed in
> /usr/share/maven/repository.
> Then we can let upstream maven (and other tools) use that.

I would even say that this is the only viable solution for the maven and friends and this doesn't interfere with the other buildsystems so everyone that cares about Maven - Join Carlo and help him achieve that

Alex

> 
> Carlo
> --
> java-devel mailing list
> java-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/java-devel