Django packages - proposed name changes

Bohuslav Kabrda bkabrda at redhat.com
Tue Jan 24 14:30:35 UTC 2012


----- Original Message -----
> Am 24.01.2012 13:18, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda:
> >
> > Hi,
> > I think that you should follow the two guidelines that I mentioned
> > in one of my previous mails: [1], [2].
> >
> > Therefore, you should use something like:
> > Provides: django-debug-toolbar = %{version}-%{release}
> > Obsoletes: django-debug-toolbar<  0.9.3-1
> >
> > And you should also throw in some comment about the change (maybe
> > just a link to this thread, so that everyone will be able to find
> > out why the changes took place). And again, let's leave it for the
> > next Rawhide :)
> >
> > Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda
> Should I have mentioned, this is a new package?
> 
> No need to provide something, which didn't exist earlier. But until
> the
> name change finally took place, it is related, somehow.
> 
> During the big change I just would need to change requirements from
> Django to python-django and I'm done. So I think it doesn't make
> sense
> to create a package django-... today and get it reviewed in 4 weeks
> again.
> 
> Matthias

Hi,
sorry for the confusion, I thought that the package already existed and you were just re-reviewing it. It's of course OK this way.

Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda


More information about the python-devel mailing list