macros.python2 requires update in F21+

Robert Kuska rkuska at redhat.com
Thu Sep 10 09:53:32 UTC 2015



----- Original Message -----
> From: "Haïkel" <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>
> To: "Fedora Python SIG" <python-devel at lists.fedoraproject.org>
> Cc: "Alan Pevec" <apevec at gmail.com>, python-owner at fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2015 10:16:43 AM
> Subject: Re: macros.python2 requires update in F21+
> 
> Hi,
> 
> Nobody answered, should I assume that everyone is ok with me pushing
> Orion's patches in F21 and F22?
> 
> Regards,
> H.
> 
> 2015-09-08 12:26 UTC+02:00, Haïkel <hguemar at fedoraproject.org>:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Recently, we had a lot of issues with openstack packages due to python
> > newer guidelines.
> > To fix upgrade path for python2 modules, you had to obsolete previous
> > python-xxx module.
> > Orion committed a fix in rawhide in the macro %python_provides that
> > fixes that issue.
> >
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python.git/commit/?id=7fdb9bedcda48894b7ba85e34ca5722b28b69076
> > http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/python.git/commit/?id=cb9dd734593c52b84f0b9b6f19f352001c1d50d3
> >
> > Could we backport these in F21/22/23 ?
> > It's rather critical, as we have less experienced packagers pushing
> > updates without checking
> > the upgrade path or provides/obsoletes. Having a reliable
> > %python_macros as in rawhide makes it more
> > robust and will avoid breaking users dependencies
> >
> > I prefer that python maintainers do the update as it's a critical
> > package, but I don't mind doing it in their stead
> > if you approve this (if necessary)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > H.
> >
> 
Hi Haikel,

sorry for no response.

LGTM (as a co-maintainer)

--
Robert Kuska
{rkuska}


More information about the python-devel mailing list