Proposal: No Cloud Disposable Clients
Nick Coghlan
ncoghlan at redhat.com
Fri Dec 5 05:34:38 UTC 2014
On 12/05/2014 10:00 AM, Tim Flink wrote:
> Any thoughts on whether this is worth pursuing as an alternative to
> openstack et. al? If there's anything that isn't clear, please ask for
> clarification.
If you're going down this path, it's almost literally Beaker's "image
based provisioning for guest recipes":
https://beaker-project.org/docs/user-guide/beaker-provided-tasks.html#distribution-virt-image-install
:)
You could either use restraint to run that directly, or else we could
likely find a way to pull the core components of that task out into
something independently reusable.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan
Red Hat Hosted & Shared Services
Software Engineering & Development, Brisbane
HSS Provisioning Architect
More information about the qa-devel
mailing list