[Fedora Robotics] Robotics SIG update
Hedayat Vatankhah
hedayatv at gmail.com
Wed Aug 25 09:28:17 UTC 2010
Hi all,
/*Rich Mattes <richmattes at gmail.com>*/ wrote on 08/25/2010 9:07:23 AM +0450:
> On 8/24/2010 9:36 PM, Tim Niemueller wrote:
> [...]
> The discussions we had in IRC the last time we met about creating some
> sort of 'game' environment for Player and Stage fit right into the
> educational goals discussed above. Tutorials and examples like Tim is
> suggesting would serve as a great jumping-off point for people to get
> started with robot programming. The availability of Python bindings to
> Player is also a boon to the effort; Python is a very easy language to
> pick up, is script-able, and can even be used interactively in the shell
> to control a bot (if you can type fast enough!) I'm happy to spend some
> time getting a plan together and running it by the rest of the Player
> devs, but I think that the goals of the SIG and upstream align quite a bit.
Nice to see some non-spam activity again ;)
I fully agree with having the demo program(s) inside the existing
upstream projects (or creating an upstream project), since I think it is
a better place to maintain such demos. As Tim said, the demo has many
areas to advance so it'll (hopefully) become a real project rather than
some few lines of code as a trivial package maintained by a package
maintainer.
I'll think about the questions Tim asked in the last part of his email
and answer later :P
Good luck,
Hedayat
> As far as the live cd, I think we should obviously plan on including as
> many of the robotics packages as we can (mrpt, rcss*, opencv,p/s/g,
> gearbox, fawkes, urg, etc) on top of the base desktop image. We can
> strip out things like office, games and productivity, but adding the
> -devel packages and devtools is going to take up quite a bit of space.
> I'd also like to make sure that all of our packages are aligned with the
> latest upstream releases, and put a lot of effort into upstreaming any
> of the changes or enhancements we make. Finally, we should definitely
> submit it as a Fedora feature once we get our act together; F15/F16
> timeframe is probably realistic.
>
> Regards,
>
> Rich
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/robotics/attachments/20100825/a9501dce/attachment.html
More information about the robotics
mailing list