Updated Guidelines Draft

[Vít Ondruch]

Dne 4.1.2012 23:02, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
> On 01/04/2012 11:19 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Dne 4.1.2012 16:31, Mo Morsi napsal(a):
>>> On 01/02/2012 08:55 AM, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>> thank you all for your comments. I updated the guidelines draft to reflect them:
>>>
>>> Again thanks for the new guidelines. Just a couple more comments 
>>> inline below
>>>
>>>> - BR: ruby is now replaced with BR: ruby-devel for Ruby packages.
>>>
>>> Possible duplication / discrepancy:
>>>
>>> - In 'Ruby Packaging Guidelines':
>>> "Ruby packages *must* require ruby-devel package at build time with 
>>> a |BuildRequires: ruby-devel|, and *may* indicate the minimal ruby 
>>> version they need for building."
>>>
>>> - In 'Build Architecture and File Placement':
>>> "All non-gem ruby packages *must* require ruby-devel package at 
>>> build time with a |BuildRequires: ruby-devel|. "
>>>
>>>
>>> Which should it be, 'all' ruby packages or just 'non-gem' ruby 
>>> packages. Most likely the former, so for simplicity sake, the latter 
>>> should be removed.
>>
>> The latter is correct, since gems requires rubygems-devel and that 
>> should be enough for gems.
>>
>
> Hrm? Don't see a rubygems-devel subpackage in the rubygems spec, is 
> this going to be updated as well to incorporate that?

RubyGems are currently build from ruby.spec. The independent 
rubygems.spec, which will allows to update RubyGems independently, is 
work in progress.

But if you check my testing repository, you'll see the rubygems-devel 
package already.


Vit
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/ruby-sig/attachments/20120105/80b53a07/attachment.html>