unconfined domains and Dan Walsh's article

[Daniel J Walsh]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/04/2011 02:22 PM, Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote:
> Am 04.04.2011 20:12, schrieb Daniel J Walsh:
>> On 04/02/2011 03:52 PM, Klaus Lichtenwalder wrote:
>>> I've been reading Dan's article about undefining the unconfined domain
>>> ("10 things you probably did not know about SELinux.. #4"). Curious as
>>> I'm often am, I tried it. And hit bugzilla 627879... Are there any plans
>>> to [continue/start] work on this?
>>
>>> Klaus
>>
>>
>>
>>> --
>>> selinux mailing list
>>> selinux at lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/selinux
>> According to this bug report, 627879 is already fixed?
>>
>>
> 
> Dan,
> 
> it does not show up in normal operation. It just showed up when I
> undefined all unconfined domains, as per your post, for tests. For
> normal operations this bug is fixed, I was more or less following on
> your plans to move along with a more stricter targeted policy...
> 
> Klaus
> 
Could you send me your audit.log?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAk2aEpwACgkQrlYvE4MpobMXaACeLJDgB1aCPHD4rfxbIBMa8ixh
YxgAoOqLj4kxR46Y+xY9eTyCW3t+LEA7
=hfdY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----