F15 blocker? lvm-monitor of snapshot hangs at reboot/shutdown

James Laska jlaska at redhat.com
Mon Apr 18 18:41:57 UTC 2011


On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 11:10 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-04-18 at 10:03 -0400, James Laska wrote:
> 
> > But that's a bit open to interpretation.  For example, it could be said
> > (I think I even did) that reboot/shutdown does work, it just takes
> > forever.  Anyone else think it would be worthwhile to adjust the Beta
> > criteria to something like ...
> >         
> >         "The desktop's offered mechanisms (if any) for shutting down,
> >         logging out and rebooting must work and perform the intended
> >         function in a reasonable time."
> 
> That's against the original intention of the criterion: the criterion is
> one of the set that came in from the desktop team, and they specifically
> wanted it to be about whether the desktop is able to trigger the action
> correctly, not whether the action actually completes successfully.
> That's not to say that we might not want to change it, but we could
> perhaps split it up, and it's something worth taking note of.

Right, I wanted to keep the original desktop use case intact, while
leaving room to capture whether the function works as intended.  As
proposed, I felt it compliments the original criteria, without taking
anything away.  I was hoping to avoid getting into whether the function
was triggered from the console and such, I liked keeping it coupled to
the preferred desktop procedure, rather than redefining the procedural
entry points.

What were you thinking?  Something more aligned with the purpose/intent
of systemd/sysV?

Thanks,
James
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20110418/72dc2e8e/attachment.bin 


More information about the test mailing list