systemd-208-9.fc20 package in f20 unsigned

[Bruno Medeiros]

On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 6:44 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> On 2013-12-07 01:54, Bruno Medeiros wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:20 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin at scrye.com> wrote:
>>
>>  Greetings.
>>>
>>> systemd-208-9.fc20 was pushed into the base fedora 20 repos last
>>> night
>>> (as it fixed a blocker bug for the upcoming release).
>>>
>>> However, it was not signed properly, so Fedora 20 prerelease users
>>> will see an error about the package not being signed.
>>>
>>> This has already been corrected and the signed package will be in
>>> tomorrow's branched compose. Please wait for that compose to
>>> update, or
>>> if you need to test that the blocker is fixed, you can use
>>> --nogpgcheck to upgrade to the new package.
>>>
>>
>>

BTW, any special reason for not having --nogpgcheck documented on "man
fedup" ?


 I'm the reporter of bug
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038863 [1] and I'm trying
>>
>> fedup 0.8.0 as suggested on this issue. I got the same error, but for
>> the package systemd-libs:
>>
>> Package systemd-libs-208-9.fc20.x86_64.rpm is not signed
>>
>> Is this package also corrected?
>>
>
> They all come from the same source package, so yes, it will be.
>

Thanks for the info.

-- 
BrunoJCM
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20131209/91ae0e86/attachment.html>