Update criteria change and proposal

[Tim Flink]

On Wed, 18 Sep 2013 17:48:33 -0700
Adam Williamson <awilliam at redhat.com> wrote:

> For those who weren't present at today's blocker review meeting -
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-blocker-review/2013-09-18/ -
> we agreed to change the Alpha criteria to require only console
> updating to work, and move the requirement for graphical updating to
> work to Beta or later.
> 
> I have updated the Alpha criteria already:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Fedora_20_Alpha_Release_Criteria&diff=353642&oldid=352247
> 
> and I hereby propose the following change for Beta:
> 
> https://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=User:Adamwill/Draft_beta_criteria_sandbox&diff=353645&oldid=353643
> 
> it's pretty straightforward, it just uses the same wording we used to
> have at Alpha with obvious tweaks. Upshot is simply that the
> requirement for graphical updating to work is moved from Alpha to
> Beta, as we basically agreed at the meeting.
> 
> The test case page would be updated to link to both criteria.
> 
> Comments, suggestions etc welcome, as this is a straightforward
> change, if no-one objects I'll put it into production pretty soon.
> Thanks!

Looks good to me.

Tim
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 490 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20130918/c4b70ac5/attachment.sig>