Criteria / validation test proposal: Installer help screens

[Jan Kurik]

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill at fedoraproject.org
> wrote:

> Hi folks! So as we noticed today, we have no test case / criterion to
> ensure the anaconda help actually works. (Note it was only introduced
> in Fedora 21 or 22). I have written a test case:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_help
>
> and I'm proposing we add a Final criterion:
>
> * Any element in the installer interface(s) which is clearly intended
> to display 'help' text must do so correctly when activated.
>
> We could also require that the intended 'Help' elements must be
> present, but that's a slightly tighter requirement - I'd ask for the
> anaconda team's opinion on whether we should do that or not. If we
> don't do that, then if by some chance the Help buttons were entirely
> *absent*, that would not be a blocker - only if buttons are present but
> don't work would it be a blocker.
>
> I'm proposing we add the criterion, and add the test case to the
> 'Miscellaneous' table of the Installation matrix.
>

​As we discussed this on Go/No-Go meeting: validity of this criteria will
start with F24 release. There are no plans to use this criteria for F23.
Right Adam ?

Regards,
Jan​



> --
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
>
>
> --
> test mailing list
> test at lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/test




-- 
Jan Kuřík
Platform & Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat Czech s.r.o., Purkynova 99/71, 612 45 Brno, Czech Republic
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/test/attachments/20151029/ce967ab7/attachment.html>