Criteria / validation test proposal: Installer help screens

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2015-10-29 at 20:11 +0100, Jan Kurik wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 7:36 PM, Adam Williamson <adamwill at fedoraproj
> ect.org
> > wrote:
> 
> > Hi folks! So as we noticed today, we have no test case / criterion
> > to
> > ensure the anaconda help actually works. (Note it was only
> > introduced
> > in Fedora 21 or 22). I have written a test case:
> > 
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Testcase_Anaconda_help
> > 
> > and I'm proposing we add a Final criterion:
> > 
> > * Any element in the installer interface(s) which is clearly
> > intended
> > to display 'help' text must do so correctly when activated.
> > 
> > We could also require that the intended 'Help' elements must be
> > present, but that's a slightly tighter requirement - I'd ask for
> > the
> > anaconda team's opinion on whether we should do that or not. If we
> > don't do that, then if by some chance the Help buttons were
> > entirely
> > *absent*, that would not be a blocker - only if buttons are present
> > but
> > don't work would it be a blocker.
> > 
> > I'm proposing we add the criterion, and add the test case to the
> > 'Miscellaneous' table of the Installation matrix.
> > 
> 
> As we discussed this on Go/No-Go meeting: validity of this criteria
> will
> start with F24 release. There are no plans to use this criteria for
> F23.
> Right Adam ?

That was the idea, yeah, though it seems like we're currently
scrambling to try and do a build with some kind of fix...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net