Custom Partition Fedora 18

[Eddie G. O'Connor Jr.]

On 02/17/2013 05:22 PM, jonc wrote:
> On 02/17/2013 04:39 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>>
>> Am 17.02.2013 22:35, schrieb jonc:
>>> It's my understanding that Fedora's primary role is to evaluate and 
>>> explore software for Red Hat, not necessarily
>>> to produce a stable consumer-level product.  That's very much 
>>> Ubuntu's mission, but it isn't Fedora's. I expect
>>> Ubuntu not to break.  I expect Fedora to break.  Oddly, in my own 
>>> experience, they both break about the same amount.
>> i expect NO DISTRIBUTION to break
>>
>>
>
> I don't think meeting that criterion is part of Fedora's objectives, 
> any more than it is part of Debian Sid's objectives. People may or may 
> not agree that Fedora follows an appropriate development path, but it 
> seems obvious that pushing the edges is antithetical to producing a 
> rock-solid distribution.
>
> Fedora 18 with Gnome Shell has been pretty good for me.  Can I say 
> that about every Fedora release? No.  There was a release, for 
> instance, that I couldn't install. So, if this F18 installation goes 
> up in smoke, I'll move on, no hard feelings. And, certainly, if I was 
> doing anything that *had* to be break-free, I wouldn't be using 
> Fedora.  I'd most likely (go back) to using CentOS.
>
Judging by your last statement am I to assume that CentOS is more 
"reliable" than Fedora?...


EGO II