Extra stuff creeping up on the website - can we clean it up?

[Elad Alfassa]

On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Máirín Duffy <duffy at fedoraproject.org>wrote:

> On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 13:06 -0400, Máirín Duffy wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 19:50 +0300, Elad Alfassa wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >         How about "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better"
> > >
> > > Since we now offer 64bit by default, we need to change this text, we
> > > are still trying to figure out what is the earliest 64bit CPU we
> > > support.
> >
> > "64-bit Intel-compatible system or better; 400Mhz or more."
> > >
>
> TBH this is a lie though, we do support 686 systems, why not just say
> "400Mhz Intel-compatible system or better", that the default download is
> 64-bit is spelled out pretty clearly on stg.fedoraproject.org.
>
> We shouldn't pretend we can't support 32 bit when we very much can.
>
> ~m
>
> yes, this is why I say the front page should only have the recommended
specs, not the minimal.
Also, I heard we now require less than 768MB of ram for install, but if we
do recommended, it should be 1GB.


-- 
-Elad Alfassa.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/websites/attachments/20120523/c5f9d579/attachment.html>