Sean Carolan wrote:
> Which yum repo? Note that all of the new 389 packages are in
EPEL now -
> see
http://directory.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Release_Notes
>
I didn't change the yum repo from when I first installed fedora-ds. I
mistakenly assumed that the developers would not move the repo around
once they set it up.
Sorry about that. Anyone know how I can set up a redirect
from the old
repo to epel?
I have removed all the packages, set up the new
repo, and used yum to reinstall them all.
> 389-admin-1.1.10 fixes a problem with SELinux support (quite possibly
> the one you had to turn off SELinux to get around).
>
Ok, that's fine, I have disabled SElinux as it's generally more
trouble than it's worth IMHO. Too many little gotchas with various
software packages. At least I will leave it off until I can get the
directory server somewhat functional.
Ok.
> Does 389-console -D 9 produce any output whatsoever????
>
Yes, this time it produced some output. There seems to be something
preventing all the GUI text from rendering correctly.
http://carolan.ws/console.log
Hmm - nothing there to indicate a problem with the GUI. Is that it? Is
this really the last line?
ResourceSet: found in cache loader9690857:com.netscape.management.client.util.default
Usually these sorts of problems are related to Java, X windows/fonts,
running the console remotely via ssh or vnc, etc. but there's nothing
here to suggest that.
I downloaded the windows version of the management console and it
seems to be working now!
You installed the .msi file on Linux?????
Kind of a hacky solution but that's how
Linux users roll eh?
What exactly did you do?
I'll play with this some more and see if I can
get some other servers using it for authentication now.
thanks for all your help.
Sean
--
389 users mailing list
389-users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users