Hi all,
just some easy questions. The quoted text is taken from
Red Hat DS 9.0 Deployment Guide.
§7.4.4 Schema Replication
In all replication scenarios...[cut] The following conditions apply:
If the version of the schema ...[master has newer]...the supplicer server
replicates to the consumer
Q1: shouldn't this happen only when changes are done via ldapmodify (as stated
in the note at the ending of the chapter)?
Q2: changes made with 98example.ldif shouldn't propagate, right?
If the version of the schema...[slave has newer]...the server may
return
many errors...
Q3: so replication still happens. I would state this clearly, like
"replication happens even in case of schema mismatching"
A consumer might contain replicated data from two suppliers, each
with
different schema. Whichever supplier was updated last wins, and its schema is
propagated to the consumer.
Q4: imho it seems a wider highway to hell -_- As of Q1,2 I can avoid it using
ldif, right?
Changes made to custom schema files are only replicated if the schema
is
updated using LDAP or the Directory Server Console
Q5: I have understood that you can't change a custom schema file using
LDAP/DSConsole. All modifications go to 99user.ldif: right?
I hope I haven't bored you too much...
Thx+Peace,
R.
--
Roberto Polli
Community Manager
Babel S.r.l. -
http://www.babel.it
T: +39.06.9826.9651 M: +39.340.652.2736 F: +39.06.9826.9680
P.zza S.Benedetto da Norcia, 33 - 00040 Pomezia (Roma)
CONFIDENZIALE: Questo messaggio ed i suoi allegati sono di carattere
confidenziale per i destinatari in indirizzo.
E' vietato l'inoltro non autorizzato a destinatari diversi da quelli indicati
nel messaggio originale.
Se ricevuto per errore, l'uso del contenuto e' proibito; si prega di
comunicarlo al mittente e cancellarlo immediatamente.