On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 12:14:27PM -0400, Joseph VLcek wrote:
On Thu, 2011-07-14 at 09:58 -0400, Hugh Brock wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:16:00AM +0100, Mark McLoughlin wrote:
> > Hey,
> >
> > Chatting to Justin yesterday, I suggested we come up with a list of the
> > top 5 features for the next release
> >
> > The idea is that these would be the features we'd concentrate on
> > polishing off for the release and then promote heavily in the release
> > announcement with demos etc.
> >
> > My attempt is below. What am I missing? Any thoughts on the idea?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > Mark.
> >
> > 1) New UI design!
> > - Complete new theme
> > - Design & Deploy, Monitor and Administer tabs
> > - Pretty View and Filter View
> > - Breadcrumbs
> > - Monitor UI
> > - "Launch Deployable" and deployments UI
> >
> > 2) RHEV-M, VMWare vSphere and CondorCloud support:
> > - Available as provider types in conductor
> > - Image build/upload support
> > - Audrey config server IP used to get addresses of RHEV-M VMs
> >
> > 3) Deployable concept:
> > - Launch multiple instances using a deployable definition which
> > lists the images to use
> > - Stop all the instances in a deployment in one click
> >
> > 4) aeolus-image CLI:
> > - Build an image from a template
> > - Push it to multiple providers
> > - Import an image
> > - List images available for use in deployables
> >
> > 5) Reduced complexity:
> > - Template creation and image building UI removed
> > - condor_refreshd, the condor classad plugin, warehouse sync,
> > image factory connector and delayed job daemons all removed
>
> Hey guys, pay attention: You get to decide what goes in this release,
> not me, and you certainly know more about what's actually in it than I
> do. What else should we be showing off for this release? Is there
> anything we shouldn't be showing off, isn't ready yet, whatever?
>
> Responses encouraged...
>
> --Hugh
>
Regarding:
> - Audrey config server IP used to get addresses of RHEV-M VMs
We do have this tested for RHEV-M v2 but it is a kludge in that the IP
address of the Config Server has to be backed into the image.
Because of this I thought we were going to wait for rhev-m 3.0 which
will have guest tools and hooks needed to inject user data and this
feature will not be announced for the pending release.
Do I have this correct?
Joe VLcek
Yeah, that's right Joe, rhev-m 2.2 is not going to be well supported
for this release. However the 3.0 beta will be available soon, we'll
focus our efforts on that.
--H
--
== Hugh Brock, hbrock(a)redhat.com ==
== Engineering Manager, Cloud BU ==
== Aeolus Project: Manage virtual infrastructure across clouds. ==
==
http://aeolusproject.org ==
"I know that you believe you understand what you think I said, but I’m
not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant."
--Robert McCloskey