Hi everybody !
Here is a little todo list born from the meeting : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Astronomy/TODO This what i mainly get oh the meeting. Please feel free to add tasks, for this is only a draft.
We should also discuss about the assignment of tasks.
Who's intersted in what ? Who can handle this task or an another ? etc ...
Those question are particulary true for the IRAF fork, this our bigger project and he asks a particular involvment. As the person which will take it in charge must be familiar with the software and able to get in contact (and keep it) with the current IRAF community, developpers. This person should also be able to divide and distribute task the more efficiently possible.
This is of course my ideal vision of the project.
Please take a look to the forementionned page, modify it, discuss it, ask, suggest, ....
Thanks for your participation in the SIG.
Have a nice day/night/afternoon/morning (refer to your local time :p) !
On Tue, 20 May 2008 22:29:58 +0200, you wrote:
Those question are particulary true for the IRAF fork, this our bigger project and he asks a particular involvment. As the person which will
I think it is a bit early to talking about a fork of IRAF, and in fact talk of forking it at this point may well cause problems with the IRAF community.
It appears that one of the IRAF maintainers has indicated that while replacing the non-free portions is not a priority for them they would consider replacing them with a contribution from outside the IRAF project.
http://iraf.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=86793
Perhaps a rewording of the task list to be less confrontational would help with getting cooperation from the IRAF developers.
2008/5/21 Gerald Henriksen ghenriks@gmail.com:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 22:29:58 +0200, you wrote:
Those question are particulary true for the IRAF fork, this our bigger project and he asks a particular involvment. As the person which will
I think it is a bit early to talking about a fork of IRAF, and in fact talk of forking it at this point may well cause problems with the IRAF community.
It appears that one of the IRAF maintainers has indicated that while replacing the non-free portions is not a priority for them they would consider replacing them with a contribution from outside the IRAF project.
http://iraf.net/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=86793
Perhaps a rewording of the task list to be less confrontational would help with getting cooperation from the IRAF developers.
I did not know about this topic, "fork" has been the first word i thought about and also the word used during meeting(if I remember well), for i did not know the work of Sergio and the contact he has already take with the IRAF community. It has been replaced.
Thanks for your precisions Gerald
astronomy@lists.fedoraproject.org