-== @ri ==-
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:40 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon <pingou(a)pingoured.fr>
wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2018 at 10:22:34AM -0400, Ari LiVigni wrote:
> Right but that wasn't your statement you said we didn't have this yet
for
> f28
Well, the two pipelines are doing different things right? One runs the
tests,
the other ensures the rpm-ostree is still buildable and runs the tests.
So while overlapping they are complementary and distinct, no?
So I stand with what I said, the Atomic CI pipeline isn't running for f28.
> and we do it just isn't plumbed on the Fedora side. There is more
> work on the Fedora side that is out of our hands to update.
> Are you working on that piece or is someone else in Fedora atm?
For one, I'd need a green light that the allpackages pipeline is running as
expected and ready for production use. Then I'll see to adjust the tools
for
this new pipeline.
This does mean we will announce it broadly and that we can expect its load
to
increase as more people opt-in.
Cool makes sense
> If you
want we can discontinue the atomic ci-pipeline ones if that makes
things
> easier for you.
Do we want to discontinue the Atomic CI one? I thought the idea was to
have both
running (see what I said above about the two pipelines being
complementary).
Let's have that discussion when Johnny is back from PTO. I am fine having
both if it makes sense and there is no duplication, which I don't think
there is since in the atomic one
Pierre
_______________________________________________
CI mailing list -- ci(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to ci-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org