On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Richard Fontana
<fontana(a)sharpeleven.org> wrote:
Does anyone think the idea of a limited-term copyleft --
particularly
given that copyleft-next is a software-oriented license -- is a
good/bad idea?
I really like the idea. It's an elegant hack on the ever-increasing
copyright term. It would also put a bound on the amount of work
involved in relicensing old pieces of code with lots of unreachable
contributors.
If anyone thinks it's a good idea, what would be a good copyleft
duration? 15, 20, 25 years?
Are there examples of 20 year-old copyleft code that would be useful
today as it was published 20 years ago? In other words, in 5 years,
could someone fork the 1998 Linux kernel and do something that would
threaten the GPL project in any way?
Francois